Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 09:45
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why did Obito, a supposed "bad person," do good things for Kakashi?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
CNN’s Live ‘Good Night, and Good Luck’ Telecast Spurs Special Coverage - Variety
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Is it true that most Indian men are gay and they just hide their feelings?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Charting the Global Economy: US GDP Falls on Larger Trade Hit - Bloomberg
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Here’s why exercise is so important if you’re a cancer survivor - The Washington Post